The data protection shield has been the subject of a legal challenge by data protection groups.   At first, it was not clear whether the cases would be deemed admissible.   However, until February 2017, the future of the data protection shield was in dispute. One consultant, Matt Allison, predicted that “the EU model, regulated by citizens, will quickly come into conflict with market forces in the US and the United Kingdom.”  Allison has summarized a new document in which the European Commission sets out its plans for adequacy decision and overall strategy.  Nothing, since the snowden revelations have profoundly changed the US surveillance law to make it less incompatible with EU data protection legislation. President Obama made some encouraging noises, but under Trump, the government helped itself help people`s data without an arrest warrant. So it`s closer to a funnel than a shield. With the cancellation of the data protection shield, companies that transfer personal data from the European Economic Area (EEA) to the United States – or transmit personal data from the EEA within the United States – must now use other mechanisms recognized by the RGPD to properly protect personal data, such as standard contractual clauses (ScCs) in data transfer or data protection agreements or mandatory business rules (BRC). The ECJ also found that parties on both sides of the data transfers regulated by the SSCs have a responsibility to ensure that data is adequately protected from unnecessary intervention or that there is no transfer. These 7 principles of the data protection shield should be read in conjunction with the 16 equally binding “complementary principles” based on the seven principles. For more information on the EU-US data protection shield framework, see www.privacyshield.gov/EU-US-Framework. Switzerland is not a member of the EU, but it pursues many EU policies through the implementation of the treaties.